Subtleties of Legal Language
Number of pages:
4
ABSTRACT:
A 4 page research paper that discusses the implications of a case. According to the majority opinion, the value of the injury suffered due to malpractice is defined as the value that can be associated with the claim as a whole, but the dissenting opinion holds that the plaintiff should be entitled to the loss that was actually sustained due to malpractice. Looking at these two statements from the viewpoint of the average reader, they seem virtually identical, but the subtle difference in wording carry tremendous import from a legal standpoint. This examination of this case demonstrates why this is so. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
FILE NAME:
File: D0_khlelang.rtf
Send Me This Paper
Back to Papers